Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

qbnkiller

Conflaguration Specialist
http://zilvia.net/f/loud-noises/306838-dont-buy-garret-turbos-anymore.html

Originally Posted by mbtech
I work at Garrett Turbos, now called Honeywell Turbo Technologies which there so proud of. When Cliff Garrett Owned Garrett He used to brown bag his lunch everyday and cared for a quality Product. If he knew what Honeywell has done now he would turn over in his grave. Honeywell bought Garrett In 1998 or 1999. After this they opened up a turbo testing lab in shanghai China and quickly moved there turbo overhaul to Mexicali Mexico, quickly after Garrett overhaul went belly-up. So they moved there whole production to Mexicali Mexico, as if that first failure was not a sign.

Garrett Turbos made a quality product for a fair price. A turbo is a precision instrument. Garrett turbos was part of Garrett Air Research (on 190th st. In Torrance ca.) Where they have a huge facility designing turbine engines, and so on. Most of the senior technicians in our main turbo facility (Lomita Blvd Torrance ca) came from our air research. If you’re building jet engines a turbo is not all that difficult. Well Cliff Garrett dies. At that time ALL production of Garrett Turbos was at Lomita Torrance ca. Also all engineering and research was there as well. After we were bought and production was sent to Mexico to save costs. Our production numbers doubled. And cost was cut in half our failure rate tripled. Well who cares Honeywell is making money and lots of it. Turbos are considered Honeywell’s golden egg. They feel that turbos are going to take over big. Which it already has in the diesel market. We make ford diesel turbos, daf, Chevrolet, some Audi, vw, fiat, Perkins. Millions of turbos. And there now all coming from china and Mexico. Well up until lately the company figured if the product was designed in the US and assembled in Mexico we would be ok. Well to further there profit and **** the customer once again....the LAST of what makes turbo American leaves in January 2011. We will close the doors to the Torrance Lab. In Torrance we did all our racing turbos (wrc stuff, Audi racing etc..) then in the garret garage we did the turbos you people buy for your Subaru’s. Actually I take that back. They take turbos that were made on a production line somewhere else in the world, and change a couple of parts on a bench in Torrance (wheels, housing..etc) and send it to you the customer saying it was made in the us.....no it was not it was just repackaged and altered a little. Well as of Jan 2011 all your turbos will be made in Mexico or china or Czech Republic. This is the last Garrett facility in the United States.

We have huge law suits pending due to turbo failures. GM is probably going to leave us.... ford has already sued us. Caterpillar has one of the largest recalls in garret history in the process. Our name is becoming ****. The last few VERY smart guys left in the company are being fired to save costs, but see our profit is already good.....they just want more. Please don’t spend 1500$ on a gt35r. Now that it’s costing Honeywell less to build turbos do you think you will see a smaller bill when you order there product? NO!. They are going to charge you even more for even less. There are countless procedures that are being terminated everyday that made our turbos THE BEST. They keep cutting corner after corner. Did you know that we shave metal off our turbine and compressor housings until they are at the EXTREME minimum needed to contain in the event of failure they are shaving every nickel off the cost of a turbo. Did you know that 2000$ gt40 you buy is all mark up. I won’t dare say the actual cost to the company in fear of a lawsuit but lets just say your sales tax is more then the production cost.

Do not buy these turbos. BorgWarner and mitsu are trying there best to compete with us making a quality product. Honeywell is using its big name to back junky turbos Like Toyota is starting to do. I guarantee in the next 8 months you will see a huge decline in quality. All designing and production is in CHINA AND MEXICO. Honeywell is taking back all there benefits they used to supply us with as employees. That way when they lay us off its as cheap as possible. Instead of saying "Well after we take a hit laying those people off we will make tons" they are just taking back all there benefits so they walk away clean and clear. We used to get a severance package. Which they just took away. One of the head engineers involved in the t3 project. (Designing the first t3) he is still with our company. he was supposed to get 44 weeks of pay if he ever got layed off (30 days and 1 week for every year with the company. 40 years with the company)Due to the new Honeywell rules he gets only 16 weeks pay they stole all that pack after promising it to him for 40 years. My fingers and about to fall off typing all this and I am heated so I don’t care about grammar I’m concerned about you people not supporting a Nazi company. Take your business elsewhere. Somewhere where you will get what your money pays for. Have a nice day and don’t forget if you hear the name HTT Honeywell Turbo Technologies Stay away

(They still use the garret stamp on the turbos)
 

qbnkiller

Conflaguration Specialist
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

it does sound that way, but I don't think it diminishes from what he is saying...
 

warmpancakes

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

as long as gas is below 3.00 per gallon its cheaper to produce anything in china or taiwan its amazing the price they can produce things at 80% cheaper than here . the companies look at it this way if ven if warranty 50% of the items sold we still make more money
 

JSM

Active member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

The company I used to work at did a lot of work for honeywell aerospace division. When the company I worked for started moving operations to Mexico, Honeywell was on board and ready to push more products our direction in an effort to save costs.

It sucks...

But here are the facts guys....where do we shop? Walmart? Ebay?

If you go buy a TV do you look for a made in USA decal and buy that or do you base your decision on price?

The consumer is just as at fault as the companies. Companies only survive if the change with consumer demands.

I am glad I work in Defense industry for this reason now, but everybody knows a tiolet seat for the defense industry is $500 -vs we would pay $10. Part of that reason is a Buy american act, sure there are paperwork issues also, consumers don't need a binder full of paperwork certifing where that tiolet seat was made, how, where did materical come from, etc.
 

JSM

Active member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

I have to remind people at work, we sell stuff to military...half the price is for the parts, other half is for the paperwork.. It both has to be correct.
 

Chedarbob90

White Trash Racing
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

I'm not a huge fan of Honeywell anymore. Three generations of my family worked in the aerospace part of it. Going all the way back to when it was called Sunstrand. My dad and uncle have both told me numerous times it has changed dramatically...even though my dad's a wrencher now he still goes in once in a blue moon and still tells me it has gotten worse and worse the last 30 years...
 

BowTy

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

Don’t know what to say, I do know that Moneywell Home and Building Automation is huge, and I dealt with it when I worked for a state government, the biggest customer they had in that state. Dealt with them for 16 years, they threw trips to Hawaii, free TVs and such at me to appease the fact that their software and hardware was always failing, I said no amount of bribes will make up for the many calls to me at 2-4am in the morning that the system crashed, again, and the answers I had to come up with to the people in those buildings as to why the system failed, again. And I am talking computer rooms, fire and life safety, not just how nice and cold it is in the building on a 10 degree winter morning.

Their answer was to “buy our new stuff, it works better” but the new only brought different problems. The Honeywell techs that came to work on the gear said their company was always buying up other companies since those companies had proven automation products. But soon they would change these new re-branded product to make it better or make it more theirs enough to work with other versions of their system (integration, distributive intelligence etc) and they would soon become unreliable. Add to that the long learning curve of those techs on the new equipment (I do see both sides, and don’t lack in compassion, or walking in someone else’s shoes, I felt for them and seldom came down on them, they at least tried and were honest with me)

So after running through the higher ranks at the government and cooking their hides, we got better service, but still the same faulty equipment. So Moneywell got rid of their brown-noser bribe specialist (who had been there for eons) and got me an honest Christian man as a factory rep. I warned he was in for the ride of his life as he could not fix what was broke; a company that is too big and too greedy to do it right, and trying to rely on bribes to curb quality products and service. And I don’t care if people will buy cheaper products and this mentality saying it fuels companies going outsourced/China, big companies have to be smarter than the average joe with a wallet (companies are smarter, there are some folks getting big coin up there that should know what they are doing with a business), and sell half way decent products or there will be problems, and ruined reputations, and in the end fail companies.

But I still had no choice, and they knew it, I had to replace all this unreliable and incompatible equipment (such as 2 year old equipment would not talk with/work with 1 year old equipment, or the front end) with all new equipment from them, it was too much to replace it all with a competitor, there would be no way to handle the down time of so many buildings still needing to be running (25 state buildings, 16 million sq ft). So I designed a performance contract, they had to guarantee it would save money to pay for itself, that way we did not fork over more money for all this, small win but the contract I put together also stipulated functionality levels, of which they promised to meet, and when they didn’t, fix it for free now, and they struggled with that one often, and I never seen so many techs working there as there were then.

Not disgruntled at all, I had a great time with all the challenges, and accomplishments/successes, and in the end we forced Moneywell to be the company they should have, at least for us, but that’s not how it should be done. I remember when Audi was a rather junky foreign car long ago, then when they had the unintended-acceleration law suits, got their shit together and made their company much better, and since that day way back when, has grown steadily into a pretty awesome company (test drove an S5, wow!), all because the consumer complained they deserved better, duh.

Jeff M
 

Ty 1885

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

Don’t know what to say, I do know that Moneywell Home and Building Automation is huge, and I dealt with it when I worked for a state government, the biggest customer they had in that state. Dealt with them for 16 years, they threw trips to Hawaii, free TVs and such at me to appease the fact that their software and hardware was always failing, I said no amount of bribes will make up for the many calls to me at 2-4am in the morning that the system crashed, again, and the answers I had to come up with to the people in those buildings as to why the system failed, again. And I am talking computer rooms, fire and life safety, not just how nice and cold it is in the building on a 10 degree winter morning.

Their answer was to “buy our new stuff, it works better” but the new only brought different problems. The Honeywell techs that came to work on the gear said their company was always buying up other companies since those companies had proven automation products. But soon they would change these new re-branded product to make it better or make it more theirs enough to work with other versions of their system (integration, distributive intelligence etc) and they would soon become unreliable. Add to that the long learning curve of those techs on the new equipment (I do see both sides, and don’t lack in compassion, or walking in someone else’s shoes, I felt for them and seldom came down on them, they at least tried and were honest with me)

So after running through the higher ranks at the government and cooking their hides, we got better service, but still the same faulty equipment. So Moneywell got rid of their brown-noser bribe specialist (who had been there for eons) and got me an honest Christian man as a factory rep. I warned he was in for the ride of his life as he could not fix what was broke; a company that is too big and too greedy to do it right, and trying to rely on bribes to curb quality products and service. And I don’t care if people will buy cheaper products and this mentality saying it fuels companies going outsourced/China, big companies have to be smarter than the average joe with a wallet (companies are smarter, there are some folks getting big coin up there that should know what they are doing with a business), and sell half way decent products or there will be problems, and ruined reputations, and in the end fail companies.

But I still had no choice, and they knew it, I had to replace all this unreliable and incompatible equipment (such as 2 year old equipment would not talk with/work with 1 year old equipment, or the front end) with all new equipment from them, it was too much to replace it all with a competitor, there would be no way to handle the down time of so many buildings still needing to be running (25 state buildings, 16 million sq ft). So I designed a performance contract, they had to guarantee it would save money to pay for itself, that way we did not fork over more money for all this, small win but the contract I put together also stipulated functionality levels, of which they promised to meet, and when they didn’t, fix it for free now, and they struggled with that one often, and I never seen so many techs working there as there were then.

Not disgruntled at all, I had a great time with all the challenges, and accomplishments/successes, and in the end we forced Moneywell to be the company they should have, at least for us, but that’s not how it should be done. I remember when Audi was a rather junky foreign car long ago, then when they had the unintended-acceleration law suits, got their shit together and made their company much better, and since that day way back when, has grown steadily into a pretty awesome company (test drove an S5, wow!), all because the consumer complained they deserved better, duh.

Jeff M

Well said !
 

BowTy

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

Well said !

Thanks, I think you can tell I still enjoyed the times I had there, even working with Honeywell. Make the best of it, try not to let shit get to you too much, you can still kick butt without losing it, patience and persistance works good too, though I still hated to hear the phone ring in the wee hours of the morning :lol:.
 

Poconojoe

Donating Member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

Don’t know what to say, I do know that Moneywell Home and Building Automation is huge, and I dealt with it when I worked for a state government, the biggest customer they had in that state. Dealt with them for 16 years, they threw trips to Hawaii, free TVs and such at me to appease the fact that their software and hardware was always failing, I said no amount of bribes will make up for the many calls to me at 2-4am in the morning that the system crashed, again, and the answers I had to come up with to the people in those buildings as to why the system failed, again. And I am talking computer rooms, fire and life safety, not just how nice and cold it is in the building on a 10 degree winter morning.

Their answer was to “buy our new stuff, it works better” but the new only brought different problems. The Honeywell techs that came to work on the gear said their company was always buying up other companies since those companies had proven automation products. But soon they would change these new re-branded product to make it better or make it more theirs enough to work with other versions of their system (integration, distributive intelligence etc) and they would soon become unreliable. Add to that the long learning curve of those techs on the new equipment (I do see both sides, and don’t lack in compassion, or walking in someone else’s shoes, I felt for them and seldom came down on them, they at least tried and were honest with me)

So after running through the higher ranks at the government and cooking their hides, we got better service, but still the same faulty equipment. So Moneywell got rid of their brown-noser bribe specialist (who had been there for eons) and got me an honest Christian man as a factory rep. I warned he was in for the ride of his life as he could not fix what was broke; a company that is too big and too greedy to do it right, and trying to rely on bribes to curb quality products and service. And I don’t care if people will buy cheaper products and this mentality saying it fuels companies going outsourced/China, big companies have to be smarter than the average joe with a wallet (companies are smarter, there are some folks getting big coin up there that should know what they are doing with a business), and sell half way decent products or there will be problems, and ruined reputations, and in the end fail companies.

But I still had no choice, and they knew it, I had to replace all this unreliable and incompatible equipment (such as 2 year old equipment would not talk with/work with 1 year old equipment, or the front end) with all new equipment from them, it was too much to replace it all with a competitor, there would be no way to handle the down time of so many buildings still needing to be running (25 state buildings, 16 million sq ft). So I designed a performance contract, they had to guarantee it would save money to pay for itself, that way we did not fork over more money for all this, small win but the contract I put together also stipulated functionality levels, of which they promised to meet, and when they didn’t, fix it for free now, and they struggled with that one often, and I never seen so many techs working there as there were then.

Not disgruntled at all, I had a great time with all the challenges, and accomplishments/successes, and in the end we forced Moneywell to be the company they should have, at least for us, but that’s not how it should be done. I remember when Audi was a rather junky foreign car long ago, then when they had the unintended-acceleration law suits, got their shit together and made their company much better, and since that day way back when, has grown steadily into a pretty awesome company (test drove an S5, wow!), all because the consumer complained they deserved better, duh.

Jeff M

By the way Honeywell and Johnson are some of the few that will give you a performance contract, and i'll take Honeywell over the company that part of their name means toilet, any day, and it has nothing to do with the fact that I put in my time and Honeywell sends me a check every month
 

BowTy

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

By the way Honeywell and Johnson are some of the few that will give you a performance contract, and i'll take Honeywell over the company that part of their name means toilet, any day, and it has nothing to do with the fact that I put in my time and Honeywell sends me a check every month

On the payroll bitch :lol: just kidding, you say it well, Johnson, Trane, Landis and Gry, not many had top levels systems, Honeywell the biggest and broadest! They were even pretty damn quick to go with a PC front end (still remember the days of the Delta 1000, you remember that one?). Glad you are getting money from them, I only spent money on them, $2.1mil, though it came from the performance contract portion!
 

Poconojoe

Donating Member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

On the payroll bitch :lol: just kidding, you say it well, Johnson, Trane, Landis and Gry, not many had top levels systems, Honeywell the biggest and broadest! They were even pretty damn quick to go with a PC front end (still remember the days of the Delta 1000, you remember that one?). Glad you are getting money from them, I only spent money on them, $2.1mil, though it came from the performance contract portion!

I get my pension check from them every month. They sold my project about a year after we seperated, funny how the company (Japenesse) that bought it, has been able to turn a profit, something they never could. I can't believe they still send stuff to MExico, after the wiper plant fiasco. Their biggest problem is they have too many bean counters and not enough managers with a set of nuts. I guess they didn't like my styhle of getting things done and offered me an early out
PS funny how i've never been in a Honeywell plant, that had one of their control systems
 

BowTy

New member
Re: Garrett / Honeywell Turbo Technologies info

I get my pension check from them every month. They sold my project about a year after we seperated, funny how the company (Japenesse) that bought it, has been able to turn a profit, something they never could. I can't believe they still send stuff to MExico, after the wiper plant fiasco. Their biggest problem is they have too many bean counters and not enough managers with a set of nuts. I guess they didn't like my styhle of getting things done and offered me an early out
PS funny how i've never been in a Honeywell plant, that had one of their control systems

Ahhh, interesting info, I learned :). Glad you are getting a check from them, these days its really good to have a checking coming in! I felt it had somethign to do with getting too big for good management practices to control it, that happens to a lot of companies and seems easy to do/hard to avoid. Now house brand building automation systems? Wonder who they used for their stuff.
 
Top