V8 vs. built 4.3

Norm

Donating Member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

I should piss a few of the "purests" off and put in a cosworth vega engine lol
 

turbodig

Active member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

Norm said:
I should piss a few of the "purests" off and put in a cosworth vega engine lol


I've got this ugly, recurring idea to do a big-turbo quad-4...
 

dgoodhue

BuSTeD 4.3
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

sparkwire said:
http://weberracing.net/Engine-Type-...k-Assembled-Shortblocks/c2_3_22_31/index.html are 4.3 builds less expensive than these? not trying to advertise just compare.

Its hard to comapre motor from 2 different shops. When I had my Corvette I would hear about guy with 2000-2500 stoker SBC with parts included. My local shop want that in labor for splayed 4 bolt SBC not including parts.

If you want to compare them, think about a 4.3 as a 3/4 350. Most of the parts cost the same, their might not be as many choices (especially connecting rods) but they rally don't cost much different to build up.

The major differences in cost for short block would be 4 bolt splayed caps, billet crank (if you go that route) for the 4.3's. I am not expert on LS series, but I think the only thing that is pricey is resleeving the aluminum blocks (I am not sure if anyone does this anymore with all the block choices out their)

Heads, their are lot of options for heads with LS and SBC's. You could get away with a basic stock heads or fully port CNC set of aftermarket aluminum heads. Their are far few choices with 4.3, Factory castings, race castings, and how much do you want to spend porting them. Their are also costs associated with swapping to Vortecs. Once you get into the more exotic heads, you really looking at full custom setup.

Once most people get into the Bowtie build up with custom heads, intake, Billet crank and realizing almost everything will have to be fabricated is when LS Turbo series, starts looking very appealing, if you going to have to fabricated it anyways might as well use cheaper motor that has more potential and still can be less stressed than an all out 4.3.
 

Norm

Donating Member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

turbodig said:
I've got this ugly, recurring idea to do a big-turbo quad-4...



I think I have to bring down some Canadian beer, and have a good drink about that idea.
 

gmcturbo

Active member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

its cheaper to go faster with a v8. i just built a 550 hp sbc for $5500 and its able to take alot of spray (all forged). can you do that with a 4.3? although that motor will never go in my ty :)
 

NecroWolf

lost marbles member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

as far as price difference i got offered a low mile 02 ss camaro ls motor for 2000. this was a cut out, complete intake to oil pan. but you would have to either use the stock ecm or get the complete fast setup w/ their ignition control box and trans controler. so pricewise its probably close in the end if you're going twin turbo. of course you could do like i'm doing and make all the upgrades you can before you swap the motor.
 

SloGN

9Sec Alky V6
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

Norm said:
I guess the guys with Grand Nationals might have something to say about that opinion!



YEAH



this has been beat to death on the buick boards too.
 

Michael

Member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

mattw said:
I'd love to see someone cram a huge turbocharged diesel in one and run it on old cooking grease..

In all seriousness I also like to see a whole variety of things in these trucks. I particularly like creative innovations that the owner did themselves and didn't pay someone else to do.


-Matt
Hey, the Isuzu/GM Duramax was designed to be installed in place of the big block Chevy! I am planning to build one for my tube chassis Vega later this year. Maybe I should do some shakedown runs in my Typhoon? ;)

Regards,
Michael Pliska
 

HighPerformanceTrucks

Lift & Shift Specialist
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

I was at the same crossroads, but I ultimately opted to stick with a turbo v6. I could have had a complete C6 Z06 7 liter motor dry sump and all and still have plenty of money left over, but I decided a Turbo V6 is really the heart and soul of the Syclone. Plus the motor is lighter and less weight hanging over the front axle which helps in my case since I'm basically road racing the truck anyway.
 

Ground Rat

New member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

ivanko barbell said:
I was at the same crossroads, but I ultimately opted to stick with a turbo v6. I could have had a complete C6 Z06 7 liter motor dry sump and all and still have plenty of money left over, but I decided a Turbo V6 is really the heart and soul of the Syclone. Plus the motor is lighter and less weight hanging over the front axle which helps in my case since I'm basically road racing the truck anyway.
Have you thought about going switching to a twin screw blower?
 

Daveman2

Autox Blazer
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

Ground Rat said:
I'd love to swap a turbo vortec 4200 I6 into my ty. I don't think it's been done before and you can make incredible power with those engines, plus boosted I6's sound like angels rejoicing.
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

I'm sort of in the same boat as the thread starter, I have a mildly built N/A V6 (maybe 240rwhp), and I am contemplating my various routes to go in the future for performance. It's already a pretty fun truck, but the LS Swap seems so tempting. However, not many cars run a v6 on the track/auto-x, so I think it's pretty interesting to keep it.

I'm also making my blazer as light as possible, so a 4.3L with a strong top end and not much low end torque would be fine, it pulls in 3rd below 1500RPM as it is, and I still have a good 300lbs to drop or more, also if I could built it so it could spin it to 6k+rpms regularly it
would probably sound amazing and be a blast to drive.

I'm also in California, so emissions always kill me. Trying to build a 300HP N/A V6 is alot harder to keep legal versus a stock 400HP aluminum V8 swap of a newer year, and then I could add bolt-ons and still stay legal but make insane power.

What to do?
 

mrweelr

New member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

ivanko barbell said:
But I decided a Turbo V6 is really the heart and soul of the Syclone. Plus the motor is lighter and less weight hanging over the front axle
My sentiments exactly...
 
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

I raced an s10 with a 700r4 and sy/ty drivetrain AWD. He was running a 327 with a 750cc carb. It was no match for the stock sy with alcohol injection.
 

NecroWolf

lost marbles member
Re: V8 vs. built 4.3

the biggest headache i could see in this would be fitting the ls motor and a 4l80 in there, being as the trans tunnel needs modified. seeing as i'm going to end up doing floor surgery at some ponit down the road on my ty i think i might just try it. does andyone have the aproximate measurements required for the modification?
 
Top