wideband choice.

[boost]

got mywideband selection down to 2 . zeitronix or plx. not clear on something i read on tuner pro . one uses tables and the other uses formula. do not understand the difference. i am going to be tuning with code 59.is one easier to use than the other for someone new to the tuning thing. thanks for replies.

 

[turbodig]

Re: wideband choice.

got mywideband selection down to 2 . zeitronix or plx. not clear on something i read on tuner pro . one uses tables and the other uses formula. do not understand the difference. i am going to be tuning with code 59.is one easier to use than the other for someone new to the tuning thing. thanks for replies.

PLX. Far easier and linear output.

 

[dourtyb]

Re: wideband choice.

I just put a PLX sm-afr in and got the code 59 bits running. It was fairly easy and I'm quite happy with the results. I didn't end up getting a display for the PLX and now wish I had. The only way to see AFR is with data logging and I'd like to have the piece of mind of the display. The DM-100 looks awesome and is probablyl the way I'll go. Add a sm-egt module or two and it would be a trick setup.